Buying the Apple Watch Series 3 in 2019.

The difference between thinking and knowing what you want.

Why do I want to talk about a two year old piece of tech? Well I bought one of these as they were just lowered in price last week by Apple with the release of the Series 5 Apple Watch and I feel as a layperson, my views on the Series 3 today in 2019 might be of interest to those reading and haven’t bought one yet themselves, but might want to.

I’ve held off buying an Apple Watch ever since they were first announced, the watch never felt capable. In the ideals of ideals I would prefer a digital watch of this caliber to last at least a week on a single charge, and I’ve always thought the Apple Watch was conservative in its design. I don’t mind if it were bigger, even the Series 5 still isn’t my ideal watch size, make it bigger! Heck give me that wrist device Leela has from Futurama, a device that comes with a larger interface,bigger battery and assumingly, more body function trackers please. A man however with expectations can dream.

I bought the Series 3 not just for the lower price, but also to temper my expectations, I allowed myself and this is ridiculous; to be disappointed with a $200 dollar purchase as opposed to an even more expensive purchase towards a later Series watch and expecting it to do more.

Go figure with that logic. But it’s working.

Because I paid less, I knew it could do less, and with expectations set to low, somewhere down the road of ownership I’d be also eventually surprised by its utility. I figured if the Series 6 came out next year, it would be an even greater improvement of course over the S5 and I’d have a better idea of how a future watch could serve me because I’m now in the ecosystem. Getting into this purchase for example, it didn’t bother me when in the Apple Store; I found out I can’t listen to podcasts locally on the watch. It only has remote functions. That means I can’t take just my headphones and Apple watch for simple supermarket journeys where I thought I could leave the iPhone at home.

Next time I guess? I know the sim version is more autonomous, but wifi in HK is so prevalent here there really is no need to buy that model.

I’ll allow the Apple Watch to disappoint this one time then. Nothing is perfect. 

Since getting this watch, let me tell you a few things I’ve realised and that I like about it.

First I don’t know what tech bloggers are talking about when they say they can shower and the watch is almost fully charged again, and charging the Apple watch everyday isn’t actually an issue for them. Because of the slow charging times on the watch, I’m left wondering how long does it take for tech bloggers to shower? It must take a long time to wash the lies and the tall tales of Apple cum off their bodies. I find the charging to be incredibly slow and the charging cable too long. Also the box is a silly shape. Sorry, I slipped a few negatives in there (the box isn’t really a big deal).

Currently while working at my computer or sitting down with a student are the best times to charge the watch. I’m moving around the least during those times so the Watch summaries at the end of each day are more inline with reality.

The Apple Watch lasts more than 18 hours a day.

I’m really happy with this. That’s Apple’s rated battery life. I’m finding I’m charging it every other day, and that’s with me sleeping with it; turning the watch to airplane mode. It makes a huge difference to the battery life. First night I slept with it, it drained by 60%, then realising my error, I changed the settings and its just a 2% drop in charge. I don’t have a fixed schedule for charging, I’ll just try and run it down to 5%-10% whenever and then charge it back up.

Never being a hard core watch owner myself, I don’t care about the delay in moving my wrist to see the time for when the screen turns on. So I’m quite comfortable with the delay, which really isn’t a delay. I think that perceived negative to be overblown.


Sometimes I think the mainstream tech bloggers lose sight or perspective on some things us lay people will live happily with. Okay, you have a series of classical watches because you’re a nerd, but most of us don’t care they tell the time instantly when you glance at it, and if your boss gets upset because you’re checking your watch in a meeting then its his/her ego that is the problem, not the watch’s inability to tell you the time on the sly.

Instead of buying the Series 5 with its always on screen, why not be not passive in meetings and admit the meetings are too damn long. Suggest the stand up meetings thing, we all know stand up meetings are far productive and you’ll get closer to completing the Move circle on your watches. Also the boss isn’t a true capitalist either if his/her ego is getting in the way of a succinct meeting so you can all get back to work.


Normally for me when checking the time I do one of three things, I ask someone ask for the time, I have to look at the top of the computer screen for the time or I tap my iPhone’s screen for it to tell me the time, compared to those three things, the watch is actually faster, and it’s always on my wrist!

I don’t even have to go to the computer or look for my phone or talk to anyone anymore. Life is good.

For some perspective, I haven’t owned a watch since the 00’s.

I don’t even remember the last watch I wore, because once I owned my first iPhone, the phone could be utilised in so many ways, I’m simply downsized what I owned, out went the clock, the radio, cd player, calculator and of course any ambition of wearing a watch.

What I do remember were the straps that came with the watch being part of the deal. Customising watch straps was never a consideration.

I’ve never bought a watch strap separate for a watch in my life and the idea to customise a watch with my perfect strap to complete me, sounds like a joke. I will never accessorise this Apple watch with another strap. Seriously I cringe when tech bloggers lament about the more expensive varieties of straps out there. Fuck off. #beyondinsanefirstworldproblemswhiletheamazonisburning

When I was in the Apple Store I could choose either a black Nike strap or a white one, fine. I’m happy with either, I’m not going to get caught up in #straplife.

I do have nice things to say about the strap itself however, it feels great on the skin and the strap is so cleverly put together, how did watch companies settle for the current strap solution for this long? I like how the strap tucks under itself 

The fitness functions and ergo the date to be gleaned; the actual things I felt were worth the asking price alone are amazing to have, I can see why “all your data belong to us Mark Zuckerberg” wants you in his ecosystem, it is truly empowering to know so much about oneself. Since owning an Apple watch, I’ve already skipped on taking the bus for a few journeys and avoided eating a cookie or two in order to be a better me.

In addition to that I’m actually taking note of all the journeys I don’t take, and deducting the savings against what I spent for the watch, in a way to prove that this thing can justify itself beyond the data collection. I love knowing how long I’m standing for, the calories I’m burning and just talking into a text message instead of typing it out.

The Move tracker however is something I’d like to adjust upwards, why is it only a 30 minute minimum? The minimums are also too easy to achieve. I’ve realised I can walk to the nearest MTR station to my house, burn a ton of calories, have the watch tell me that I’m technically doing a workout (or one time it says I’m on the elliptical) and include that “workout” into my minimum of 30 minutes of exercising.

The bar the watch sets, is so low, but Apple know the lifestyles of millions of people, so maybe the bar has to be low in order to encourage everyone to consider living the healthier lifestyle so they live for longer and buy later series of Apple Watches. I’d like to though increase in increments, the physical activity I can do.

One hesitation I did have with ownership of an Apple Watch was being interrupted directly on the wrist as I go about my day. That isn’t turning out to be the case because I only ever really talk to one person on iMessages and thankfully Facebook via WhatsApp doesn’t have a complication for the Watch. WhatsApp users aren’t able to badge me. There is a 3rd party company offering a complication, but you have to pay. That’s a good incentive to not install it.

Upon setting up the watch, the iPhone side loads all the complications it can related to the apps you have on the phone. “Oh you have it on the phone here, the watch can have it too”.

You have to consider everything that was installed, but it takes two minutes. iMessage functionality is a nice bonus however with Siri perfectly composing my spoken words into text.

This purchase really is about understanding what is going on with me body wise. I have a digital scale, I use a sleep tracker on my phone and I felt the Apple Watch would compliment those devices to fill out my profile. I just need the watch to prick me now and again for free blood testing as opposed to going to the doctors. A foot massage or a handjob would be welcome also. You can see I really wanted this watch for body tracking and to measure me. 

<zerowaste mention>

I did originally want to buy a secondhand Apple Watch to save a bit more money but the prices are fluctuating and are trading fast online so much I saved myself the stress and bought new. Also these batteries don’t last long either, so any savings I made by buying second hand would catch up with me probably a little later on with an expensive battery swap.

</zerowaste mention>

Some final tidbits, I got to say I like the ability to ping my phone, the ability to automatically unlock my Mac, Spotify is something I can see myself using more of because of the watch, the remote functions with Castro, the camera app and its overall functionality are helpful. Importantly and oddly, it really does feel like a watch instead of a computer. The computering stuff just gets out of the way, keypresses are at a minimum. As for the screen size itself, now having used it for nearly a week, it isn’t *that* bad, it makes me happier I bought the Series 3 even over the discounted Series 4 that are still in stock. I can deal with it and I’m actually content with this until something that can justify the need for a larger screen is released.

This is the first time I’ve bought a serious bit of tech with a clear understanding how it can serve me and how long I would expect to use it for. I think I choose correctly. For the moment though, this is a really cool piece of tech. If you’re considering one, I hope my opinion helps.

— — — — —

This article is actually the written script for episode #76 of the Loose Rants Podcast. If you fancy listening instead of reading, then look for ‘Loose Rants” on Spotify or iTunes or go to

What Lies Ahead for Periscope - Discoverability (Part Two)

What lies ahead for Periscope - Monetisation. Discussed the issue of monetisation for creators; how they shouldn’t wait for Periscope to build in monetisation features. I advocated the idea to create their own revenue streams now, so as not to be solely dependant on Periscope. This came about because creators on YouTube had their channels demonetised. Those creators (on YouTube) that haven’t suffered, have other sources of revenue as a fallback. Periscopers should do the same. 

Part 2 deals with Discoverability, Part 3 deals with the quality of the live-streams present on the Periscope platform.


One of the largest concerns from the community since late 2015 has been one of search and discovery; finding the best broadcasters possible. The Periscope app hasn’t made any real progress towards finding consistent, and quality, live-streams in its two year history. 

One implementation that was seen as a step towards allowing viewers to simply find something to watch was the VIP program. The VIP program enables VIPs to give the Periscope editorial team a heads up on live-streams they think are worth promoting (a VIP can in fact notify Periscope and the editorial team will review it live in order to feature it).

Currently the most fruitful way (in terms of quantity) of finding a live-stream involves looking at the list view. The list view provides thumbnails and titles of broadcasts, all streams sit equally on the list (unless featured), much like your homepage on the YouTube app. The immediate difference though to the YouTube app; those videos on the YouTube app are a mixture of what the app thinks you may want to watch and from those creators you already subscribe to.

Pictured above are the four main screens with which to find broadcasts on Periscope vs the three screens from YouTube pictured below.

Aside from the list view on Periscope, you can find streams on the world map (streams are seen geographically). There is also the ‘TV’ tab, showing the recent broadcasts of those you follow. This aspect of the app does have some variation to it. If a stream is of importance, Periscope can push it to your device to ‘feature’ above the existing replays on that list and provide a category bubble further letting viewers understand the context, it may be ‘Travel’, ’Politics’, ‘Culture’ and so forth. These featured scopes depend on a 24 hour editorial team. 

This is short summary goes towards explaining what discovery currently is on Periscope. As there is no true search capability (category search) and understandably, looking for something live is quite a task due to the nature of the stream ending at any moment. Search has to lean on the broadcaster rather than the content. Finding something to watch on YouTube is no contest because it’s the largest video library in the world; with videos also having less ephemerality and tagging built in compared to broadcasts on Periscope.

How does discoverability get better? I’m aware of a Twitter endeavour to algorithmically determine the content of live-streams to make the identification process easier. That aside (which isn’t out yet) what is the solution? A similar intent is being made towards nudity.

Something that could have been implemented in 2016 was the ability to let the scoper decide on their own category bubble, from that, a basic form of categorisation could be collectively formed by broadcasters and used as another form of search by viewers. The implementation of this type of tagging and categorising towards broadcasts can also be organised in a summary based on the last five streams. 

If I made five streams with a tag like ‘travel’, then I’m in the travel section of a gallery list of other likeminded topics. I could automatically transfer over to politics if (because I’m in Hong Kong and Hong Kong people protest as a past time) the next three streams were tagged ‘Politics’ (three more streams puts me over the middle of five as the preceding last two would still be travel related).

This would also solve the existential issue broadcasters might have if they think they fit in more than one category. The app decides dynamically, balancing the broadcaster’s position based on the frequency of the tags . If the user forgets, the system ignores the scope, until the majority of untagged scopes takes you out of any category.

This way, viewers have an extra avenue in search functionality towards discovering other broadcasters and the proposal is simply extending the existing system used by the editorial team. It isn’t wholly a brand new form of discovery to design, develop and test for, for the Periscope team. The algorithm isn’t complex either, it simply sorts broadcasts on a weighting scale determined by broadcasters willing to tag their broadcasts.

The VIP Program and Search Results

The VIP Program is supposed to be the other way of discovering and boosting the visibility of Periscopers on the platform. In retrospect the VIP Program seem to be a solution that goes the long way round towards enhancing discoverability on the platform.

The VIP Program requires a lot of behind the scenes effort to implement and maintain by the Periscope team, its been in operation for quite some time now, with VIP scopers reflecting on its actual aims. I’m one of them and I’ve always thought the VIP system would come in phases, currently it still seems to be on phase one of an implementation, like it’s still unfinished.

One of the benefits of the platform is to be given “Prioritisation in people search results, so people can find you more easily” (as stated on the VIP sign up page). I don’t know how true this actually is as I can’t make comparisons to my status before the program.

I do know, that those following is a factor, type ‘Jonathan’ into periscope and i’m 10th, the results are in ranked order because of following. All twenty in the search result are twitter verified with myself in the middle. If I type ‘jonathanjk’ all my accounts show up regardless of their VIP status in the top twenty.

If I type ‘Hong Kong’, I don’t show up in the top twenty, the placement depends me putting ‘hong kong’ into my profile. Just like followers is being counted (and number of followers being counted as part of the search placement results is dynamic, if I over took Jonathan Ross from British TV, I’d be first), I think location should as well, without me putting it in my description. Changing my profile description to include ‘#hongkong’ actually immediately places me 6th on the list.

What also caught my eye was my New York Times editor friend, he’s ninth on the list and never scopes, he has over 1k following because of his Twitter verification and twitter presence (huge). A lot of Twitter verified users do show up in the rankings, while I have no beef against that on the surface. I wonder how active those accounts on the whole are. My friend’s isn’t at all and it got me thinking, if following numbers have an impact on search results, why can’t the regularity of when someone broadcasts have an impact as well? Surely if a person is interested in following a scoper from Hong Kong and wants to know more, does the platform benefit by throwing up accounts that are hardly used? Surely active accounts should get a higher ranking. How often a scoper broadcasts is even in the requirements for the VIP program.

Periscope is in the business of connecting viewers with broadcasters, so do it!

Now does any of what you’ve read help with the perception of quality broadcasts? No, this is just one piece of an already large pie when discussing discoverability. We will return to this in part 3.

The PET (Periscope Editorial Team)

It strikes me as odd that the Periscope team feature types of broadcast that have a limited appeal to viewers or regularly feature similar looking scopes. Looking at the watch time would illustrate the video featured isn’t of interest and I’m not sure how many sunset scopes or lovely walks in the country side I can take anymore, .

Simply put. I have five minutes, I’m looking at my home-screen, where do I use those minutes? On the YouTube app where an algorithm gives me what I want, or a live video (if it’s still live) of something a human has curated for me on Periscope. The live experience counts so much, but typing is extra work on Periscope, for YouTube, it’s an after thought.

It’s been made clear to me from a member of the team at Periscope that Periscope won’t feature replay broadcasts. I would argue against that somewhat as YouTube is mostly all replays. Second, are the 6-7 scopes featured, really the best of what the Periscope platform offers? With featured scopes also staying on my phone for roughly 24 hours. Do you know how fast YouTube works to cater to my flippant tastes on its home-screen?

YouTube is All About the Replays!

I want to suggest a doubling of the number of featured scopes. To save time for the viewer, split them across two feature boxes as opposed to one. Later, with time, feature a greater variety of broadcasts and dedicate the feature boxes to single categories? With watch times in these scopes amounting to 17 seconds to a 1 minute, there needs to be more featured content because people drive through them almost instantly. The average watch time proves this.

To further this suggestion of featuring more broadcasts, (in order to better flesh out the app, and keep people onboard) VIP scopers are somewhat at a loss with the fact that Periscope makes no effort to help scopers with providing residual value to their replays (how can they be shown again). Though to defend Periscope first, it wouldn’t hurt broadcasters to figure out a way where they the broadcaster themselves could indulge in a little bit of self-promotion by their own means. I know Periscope is about the live experience first, but this only goes so far towards entertaining users when there are only so many live scopes at any one time. Why can’t their be a‘Remember This?’ or ‘You Missed This’ feature which do in fact show replays. Is there really any harm in having a replay section to feature more entertaining scopes? To provide even more variety Periscope has to look back for great replays that were never featured live. If you want to get technical, featured live scopes are featured longer on the replay than they are live anyway.

Broadcasters can be happier because there is a potential for further discovery and second, there is more content to keep people on the app. The editorial team in theory should be able to pick even better scopes because the scopes don’t need to be live and you can use ‘watch time’ as a metric for scopers who want to submit broadcasts to this section of the app.

To Conclude

There isn't really a conclusion to this as part 3 directly continues and concludes on part 2. Part 3 will directly address the issue of quality broadcasts through a more in-depth discussion of watch time.